| |
This is an investigation into mereology -- the theory of parts and wholes -- its axiomatization, and its application to a traditional philosophical puzzle. A central issue is whether the notion of parthood, as pretheoretically understood, is extensional, i.e. whether wholes can differ without differing in their parts. Most people intially think it is, but that seems to commit us to the literal identity of a statue and the clay of which it is made, an identification many want to resist as it seems to violate Leibniz's Law. The resolution of this problem has a number of implications for our understanding of pretheoretical conceptualization of physical objects generally and for metaphysics and meta-metaphysics. |
| |
two months -- July and August |
| |
At least two philosophy courses, including one at least partly in metaphysics. |
| |
Weekly meetings with short weekly papers. A final research paper (20-40pp) |